From: "baby_grand " Date: Fri Dec 20, 2002 12:41 pm Subject: Re: What is it? Godzilla applies a steady dc current directly to the bloodstream via the electrodes that are designed to provide a LOT of current in the concentrated area right over the artery of the wrist. The current, if run too long might cause some soreness, so we change it by a manual switch every five minutes or less to be cautious. I believe the dc current builds up a radiation effect on the microbes that sterilizes them, they can't reproduce, similar in a way to the sterilization of nuclear radiation. Beck devices try to do this sterilization of the microbe, also, but by rapidly reversing the current a few times a second (4 hertz), they fail to build up the radiation effect by cancelling out the charge each time the current reverses. Clark's device claims to shatter microbes by resonance, not disable their reproductive systems..to actually shatter them into bits. The current may be applied to palms or to wrists, etc and it's supposed to vibrate them to death. I am no expert, but this is what I understood from the literature. The current in a Clark Zapper is merely turned on and off again rapidly. It does not reverse polarity. It goes, say, from 0 volts to some positive voltage, and back to zero. The classic Clark devices, the earliest ones did this 30,000 times a second. Since it does not reverse the current, there's little or no "skin effect" meaning the current will not just rise to the surface of the body. That debate went on awhile! So far, Beck's device was used for one year an hour a day on bloodstream of one Hep-c patient (justerl). He didn't get much results with it. The count varied the whole year between 700,000 and 2,200,000 using Beck's device, and taking colloidal silver and ozonated water, too. With Godzilla, his numbers went like this: 2,200,000 1,600,000 1,500,000 45,000 14,000 ..or 99.3% reduced from what it had been using the Beck device from SOTA instruments (the industry std only one approved by Beck). Each reduction was over a 3 week period, so this is 15 weeks for the almost complete reduction of the incurable hep-c virus. Nothing else, no drugs, etc were used in that time frame. At first, he dropped the colloidal silver and the ozonated water, and just used Godzilla. He says it might be possible to do this ONLY using Godzilla. But in the middle of the test period, I think he started using Colloidal silver and also the ozonated water again. So perhaps with all three, Godzilla is at its best. We can retest, but he wants health, too, not just a test subject, he's been our hero so far. Hope that answers your question. You may want to apply this or just understand it, either is fine, but I hope you will apply it to something serious and possibly help someone out, and get more test results so we know the truth. We aren't trying to make a living at this, just find out what is what. I have asked that we concentrate on further tests of Godzilla, since it so clearly worked a steady decline on this stubborn microbe. The Beck/Rife/Clark info is huge and well-covered on other forums. This Godzilla idea is brand-new territory as far as research goes, and shows promise, so I've dedicated the group's efforts to it. There's also a few debates about possible dangers with dc. Some claiming it is dangerous and shouldn't even be used at all. They cite things like electrolysis where current is used to destroy hair follicles. Such destruction uses tiny dc current. But it is applied in a very small area, so the density is very high, much higher than we are using. In other cases large amounts of dc are being referred to while we are using small amounts. Also the time periods are left out of the studies sometimes. I've been all over it and concluded best to go cautious and report problems, but not to halt it out of worry over things that could be out of context. Medical devices like iontophoretic drug appliances use much larger dc currents for much longer periods of time, and they are FDA approved, so there's at least some sort of idea that it isn't going to be drastically harmful. Some will immediately react saying FDA approves all sorts of dangerous things, etc, and we shouldn't listen to them, ever. I will delete scare messages as provocative. Overall we have to record what we find on this to warn others if dangers exist. If they are only said to exist, then we should note that, also. I have no preference except to nail the germs and restore health in the best way possible. This is a tiny amount of dc for a small time period, and compared to losing a liver and dying from hep-c, I think there should be a perspective of relative benefits/risks. Certainly those with the disease can testify to that, and their wishes rule here. bG --- In microelectricitygermkiller@yahoogroups.com, "regehr2001 " wrote: > Some time ago I asked how a Godzilla is different from a Beck device > or a Clark zapper, and what it achieves that the others don't. I don't > recall any answer to these questions. Can someone lay this out to me? > Leo